We have to find a solution that not only solves the bigger problem but also goes hand in hand with the economic growth.
Offset: The Best of the solutions
1-it tries to make a balance with the emission
2-changen the gas to no2
US should look on the developing nations and start their new awareness projetcs in those countries like,pakistan,india,iran,vietnam,thailand
we must help solve the problem hand in hand... and----fast!!!!!.. i mean what would the world be in the next 50 yrs? we sometimes do take this problem as though it's so simple to be solved or rather it will take a longer time for the harmful effects to take place.
''pls think again before it too late. Thank you.''
Wednesday, April 8, 2009
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
The effects of global warming
1- economic consequences. Hurricanes cause do billions of dollars in damage, diseases cost money to treat and control and conflicts exacerbate all of these.
2- Spread of disease. As northern countries warm, disease carrying insects migrate north, bringing plague and disease with them.
3. Increased probability and intensity of droughts and heat waves .Africa will receive the worst of it, with more severe droughts also expected in Europe.
4-Polar ice caps melting
A-it will raise sea levels
B-melting ice caps will throw the global ecosystem out of balance
C-temperature rises and changing landscapes in the artic circle will endanger several species of animals
D- global warming could snowball with the ice caps gone
Refrences
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/sciencetech/5-deadliest-effects-of-global-warming/276
2- Spread of disease. As northern countries warm, disease carrying insects migrate north, bringing plague and disease with them.
3. Increased probability and intensity of droughts and heat waves .Africa will receive the worst of it, with more severe droughts also expected in Europe.
4-Polar ice caps melting
A-it will raise sea levels
B-melting ice caps will throw the global ecosystem out of balance
C-temperature rises and changing landscapes in the artic circle will endanger several species of animals
D- global warming could snowball with the ice caps gone
Refrences
http://www.environmentalgraffiti.com/sciencetech/5-deadliest-effects-of-global-warming/276
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
what is global warning and what are the causes?
Global warming is the increase in the average temperature of the Earth's near-surface air and the oceans since the mid-twentieth century and its projected continuation
1- Global surface temperature increased 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) during the 100 years ending in 2005.[
2-responsible for most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the twentieth century,
3-Factories and a major cause of environmental pollution.
The first and foremost reason for global warming is a human.He has just become money minded and for his small profits he has been simply destroyed the gifted nature.This has ultimately given rise to a major problem-GLOBAL WARMING!!! The increased use of automobiles,ACs,refrigerators emit gases that contribute in global warming.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
1- Global surface temperature increased 0.74 ± 0.18 °C (1.33 ± 0.32 °F) during the 100 years ending in 2005.[
2-responsible for most of the observed temperature increase since the middle of the twentieth century,
3-Factories and a major cause of environmental pollution.
The first and foremost reason for global warming is a human.He has just become money minded and for his small profits he has been simply destroyed the gifted nature.This has ultimately given rise to a major problem-GLOBAL WARMING!!! The increased use of automobiles,ACs,refrigerators emit gases that contribute in global warming.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
Bush fires were not caused by global warming
Last Updated: February 17. 2009 9:30AM UAE / February 17. 2009 5:30AM GMT
A fire engine flees out-of-control flames from a bushfire in Bunyip State Forest, 125km west of Melbourne. Some observers blame the current drought on global warming, others on low temperatures in the Indian Ocean. AP Photo
I congratulate the bravery of Phil Painter in his letter Balance on global warming (Feb 16) for daring to express what many might consider heretical views on the subject of man-made global warming. It has long puzzled me that eminent scientists (and less eminent politicians) have been prophesying global catastrophe based on an almost insignificant increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The current figures show that in the past 50 or so years, carbon dioxide as a percentage of the total atmosphere has increased by little more than 0.01 per cent. The longer term forecasts estimate a 0.03 per cent increase by midcentury. Is the earth really so fragile that a 0.03 per cent difference will cause climactic cataclysm? Somehow I think not.
I find it particularly troubling that the global warming lobby so eagerly jumps on a tragedy such as the recent wildfires in Australia to use as an awful warning of what is to come. The fact is that the current drought in the southern half of Australia that created the conditions for the fires to start and to spread, is being caused by an unusually large volume of cold water currently sitting in the southern Indian Ocean. As a consequence, the westerly air-flows that cross Australia instead of being warm and moist have been clear and dry. Result: no rain and higher land temperatures. It’s worth noting that the last time such a dramatic shift in the Indian Ocean oscillation (as it’s known) was observed was in the 1940s – and was followed by 25 years of quite severe global cooling that had climate scientists warning that the planet was on the edge of another Ice Age.
Last Updated: February 17. 2009 9:30AM UAE / February 17. 2009 5:30AM GMT
A fire engine flees out-of-control flames from a bushfire in Bunyip State Forest, 125km west of Melbourne. Some observers blame the current drought on global warming, others on low temperatures in the Indian Ocean. AP Photo
I congratulate the bravery of Phil Painter in his letter Balance on global warming (Feb 16) for daring to express what many might consider heretical views on the subject of man-made global warming. It has long puzzled me that eminent scientists (and less eminent politicians) have been prophesying global catastrophe based on an almost insignificant increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide. The current figures show that in the past 50 or so years, carbon dioxide as a percentage of the total atmosphere has increased by little more than 0.01 per cent. The longer term forecasts estimate a 0.03 per cent increase by midcentury. Is the earth really so fragile that a 0.03 per cent difference will cause climactic cataclysm? Somehow I think not.
I find it particularly troubling that the global warming lobby so eagerly jumps on a tragedy such as the recent wildfires in Australia to use as an awful warning of what is to come. The fact is that the current drought in the southern half of Australia that created the conditions for the fires to start and to spread, is being caused by an unusually large volume of cold water currently sitting in the southern Indian Ocean. As a consequence, the westerly air-flows that cross Australia instead of being warm and moist have been clear and dry. Result: no rain and higher land temperatures. It’s worth noting that the last time such a dramatic shift in the Indian Ocean oscillation (as it’s known) was observed was in the 1940s – and was followed by 25 years of quite severe global cooling that had climate scientists warning that the planet was on the edge of another Ice Age.
Sultan,Khalifa and Abdulla
My name is Khalifa and my team is Sultan and Abdulla. We will write about Global Warming.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)